Archive - Ask RSS Feed

Snack on these nuggets of training wisdom – taste great, zero calories

Katie Stroud is a “learning solutions engineer” who I met on Twitter many moons and projects-worked-on-together ago. As we chatted this morning about missing being at #ASTD2012 this week, she started saying some things worth repeating.

What follows is a brief interview where you’ll find some tasty nuggets of wisdom you’d do well to savor (in bold for the skimmers). Enjoy.

Roger: I love “learning solutions engineer…”  Tell me about your approach.

Katie: Thank you. I couldn’t use just any ol’ title. Instructional Designer, Consultant, Trainer, or even Training Specialist either imply a narrow field of practice or is too vague to really mean anything.

What I love to do is solve problems. Businesses often throw training at problems, but training isn’t always the solution, and even when it is the solution, it won’t solve the problem unless it’s designed and applied appropriately. Content, timing, audience, motivation, delivery and several other factors must fit together if you really want to make a difference.

I’m an engineer at my core, and I like to think that engineering learning solutions is my way of making the world a better place.

 

Roger: What do you see as the biggest challenge with vILT or live, online presentations?

Katie: Well, that depends. There are at least two sides to any live online presentation or virtual instructor-led training (vILT): the audience and the presenter.

From the audience’s perspective, attending a vILT session or online presentation is a way to cross something off their list and is easily played in the background while they get “real work” done. And for the presenter, it’s a way of providing information to the audience so that they can cross something off their list to meet a business goal. This is the problem.

While more people are embracing online delivery as a viable option for reaching their audiences, many still see online presentations as a waste of time. They often think that to be really effective, they have to do it face-to-face onsite.

As professionals who have seen how valuable an engaging online session can be, we have to change this perception. Doing that means working on those who deliver online presentations and helping them improve their skills. There’s a bit of a learning curve involved, but even small changes in online delivery make a HUGE difference.

Improved online presentations means that audiences look forward to, and even value, being engaged via an online presentation. It means the audience can begin to see the difference between a good presentation and a great one. It means that online presenters and facilitators are faced with overcoming competition, but that’s a good thing because it means that more “great” online presentations are being delivered, and it means that more people can expect more and learn more from attending an online session.

 

Roger: So if many or most online presentations or classes aren’t great, does “mediocre” happen because people don’t know any better? Or do they know better but don’t do what it takes to improve?

Katie: To be honest, I think it’s about time. Whether or not they know better, doing anything better than “mediocre” takes time, and sometimes mediocre is all that’s needed to cross something off the list and say, “Look. I accomplished something today.”

But once people realize that there’s a better way and that improvement means stronger outcomes, then I think they may have trouble sorting out what’s effective. Even more debilitating is the misconception that they have to be graphic designers and movie stars to be effective. You and I know that’s not true, but there was a time when I was in their shoes and I didn’t know where to get started.

 

Roger:  What would you suggest to someone who wants to improve? What’s the best next step they can take?

Katie: For starters, they can start attending 1080 Group webinars! (smiley face) <Roger blushes here>

All joking aside, improving any skill takes commitment and practice. I’m only half-joking about attending 1080 Group webinars. You have a powerful way of demonstrating how it’s done because you practice what you preach. The first step to improving is finding out what’s out there and identifying the little things that take a presentation from good to great.

The next important thing is to realize that we’re talking about more than slide design. In fact, slide design is only a small part of the equation. Producing better online presentations and vILT sessions means improving the whole experience: voice, timing, content structure, and audience engagement are some of the other factors that come together to create a great presentation.

Finally, a great presentation means rehearsal. Great presenters know that rehearsing a presentation is vital to solid delivery. This is true whether you’re face-to-face or behind a computer screen. It doesn’t matter how good you are; practicing really does make perfect. It also helps to ease nervousness and makes unexpected situations easier to handle.

The “reusability paradox” & 5 tips for pre-recorded presentations in live webinars

As long as there have been events of any kind, meeting planners and producers have been getting creative to make it all happen. Likewise, pre-recording a presenter or presentation to be used in a live webinar or webcast is true the virtual producers among us.

In part one of this two-part series I looked at five scenarios that might give you an idea about how to use this hybrid approach. Now let’s look at getting the most out of these scenarios.

Get clear on the differences between live and recorded

The discerning observer should recognize that live presentations, recordings, and hybrids are different beasts. They’re not right or wrong; none is superior, per se, but there are tradeoffs.

An adept presenter will be more engaging and influential than a recording, but sometimes the best live events don’t make for great recordings.

Conversely, a great recording may make for a better outcome for on-demand viewing, but you miss the opportunity to use tactics that engage the audience, dial in messages, and guide them in real time. (By the way, if your webinars or webcasts are essentially “talking at people events, I’d play devil’s advocate and ask why they’re live to begin with).webinar recordings

Events that use a pre-recorded segment from the presenter and are interactive around the pre-recorded presentation might be the right thing for your business model, but don’t get trapped into thinking you’re giving something up. Neither the live event or recording will be truly optimal.

Think about what marketers do…they segment audiences when they communicate so they can make messages more specific (and improve their results). You can blend recordings and live sessions, but more often than not, neither output will be as good as if you focus on one or the other.

Evaluate the tradeoffs

Attention span

Audiences have longer attention spans for live events than recordings. If your presenter is engaging and interactive, you’ll keep the audience involved for longer (and have a better chance at landing your message). It’s not uncommon for a webinar to have 30-50 minutes of presentation time that audiences pay attention to. But what is the average view time for a recording? Not long. So if you go somewhere in the middle, what do you have? Again, it’s not “wrong,” but you likely have a short webinar, a long recording, or both.

Production and delivery values

Live events come with different expectations about production values (versus recordings). The power of “all live” is that the human experience is more than just content…it includes indefinable things that are part of “being there.” A good presenter can make the live event a truly unique event.  It’s like the difference between listing to a band’s studio recording (mp3 or CD) and seeing them live. The live band doesn’t technically sound as good as the recording, but it’s an experience – a different experience.

Live communicators value effective communication, which usually doesn’t include voice-over-talent -type voice quality and execution. In fact, the old idea that you want to eliminate every uh and um has even been challenged by research that implies that such disfluencies are useful. Further, an adept live presenter uses “call backs,” repetition, and other techniques to hook the audience and make sure their message sticks.

Staffing needs

Pre-recording a presenter likely changes the type and timing of your staff. First, you need somebody to execute, logistically, the production of the recording. Then you need to figure out how to play it in (or in conjunction with) your live webinar or webcast. Finally, you may need to staff the behind-the-scenes crew with more bodies to handle questions (remember, you can’t have a moderator who can say, “Nigel, that last point you made brought up some more questions…could you clarify what you said right there?”).

Time cost to the audience

So, if the upside is delivering an interactive experience, the downside is “time cost.” It “costs” the audience more to show up at 11am on a Thursday than it does to watch something at a time that’s convenient for them.

If you ARE going to pre-record the presenter and play it in an otherwise “live” webinar or webcast, remember these:

Know your audience

How will the see and hear the video? Will that happen inside the webinar/webcast solution or separately? If separately, do they have the right software? What are the bandwidth requirements?

Don’t underestimate production time

Getting the recording ‘just right’ and then playing it during a live webinar changes the game.

Get commitment on rehearsing

The good news is that webinar/webcast software is easier to use than ever before in history. The bad news is that rehearsal habits have gotten worse. Set an expectation that you’ll need a complete logistical walk-through.

Err on the side of shorter

As Dr. John Medina points out in Brain Rules, attention starts to wane in in-person audiences about 10-minutes in (and suggests figuring out how to ‘break it up’ with some form of pattern interrupt). If you want to show someone a 20 or 40-minute pre-recorded presentation, it better be really, really damn good.

Maximize interactions around the pre-recorded part of the webinar

Put extra effort into connecting with the audience before and after the recording. Create a sense of presence by interacting purposefully through a variety of tactics.

Marketing webinars to clients with no time – four critical questions to ask

In a recent webinar Julie asked, “What are your suggestions for marketing to clients who say they don’t have time for training?”

Julie, this is a challenge common to many organizations. Please permit me to ask a few hard questions – only to root out what we’ve got to do.

Is a LIVE virtual presentation/classroom the right way to engage them?

In other words, what does it bring to them uniquely over simply having a video posted on YouTube? At some point, knowledge alone is something people perceive they can access on demand – any time they need it.

If your live session is simply information, it’s possible that either 1) there’s little or no differentiation between your live session and what they think they can otherwise get or 2) there is no perceived value or differentiation.

The first is a content and experience design problem, the second is a communication problem, which leads to my next question.

Is there something, anything, that your target market has ever gone out of their way (spent their own time and money) to pursue?

It’s a rhetorical question. The answer is, “Of course.”

The reality is that nobody has time or money for anything that they don’t perceive value in, and usually that value has to be pragmatic (“How can I impact my job/business NOW?”).

I assume you’ve got something valuable, and you believe you do, too.  I presume you’ve got something that can positively impact them. Figure out the WHY that’s greater than the HOW, and you’ll have nailed down what to communicate to them.

What can you do to create an experience for them in the live session?

People are most impacted when they are engaged cognitively, affectively, and kinesthetically. In other words, holistically.

If attending your live session is no different than watching a YouTube video, refer back to question number one.

The power of the synchronous classroom, however, is that it’s a live, instructor/presenter-led experience – or has the power to be.

Examples:

  • Do they have access to an expert to get a question answered?
  • Is there “workshop” time for them to do exercises and apply what has been learned?
  • Is there a social aspect that has participants engaging with not only the instructor/presenter, but their peers as well?
  • Do participants have a chance to give input and have their voices/feedback heard?

The list could go on and on. But these are things we do in classrooms that often aren’t done in “webinars.”

How do you communicate that experience to people?

Now that you’ve created a live experience that goes beyond data-only, do your marketing communications help the invitee “own” that?

This might mean needing to go beyond “attend this webinar/training session to learn…,” and frankly, you probably should go beyond “attend this live, interactive webinar/training session to learn…”  People don’t believe it, because that’s not the common experience. It’s an intangible, and being descriptive is usually needed to differentiate from the other “talk at you for 45 minutes” webinar experiences they’ve had.

Separately, if you want to gain some insight about the interactions that people find engaging, taking this survey and viewing the results at the end might yield and idea or two for how you develop your training sessions.

All my best!

Suggestions for combining live visuals in a webinar presentation

Jahna in Australia asked…”This presentation is PPT slide – any suggestions for combining live visuals?  Does this assist connection and involvement?”

Jahna, I see from the time stamp of this question that you asked this prior to me doing a live desktop demonstration.

Here, however, are a couple tips for doing live desktop sharing using web conferencing:

Spare your audience any steps that aren’t critical

For example, if you log in using a user name and password, it might be worth sparing your audience the time it takes for you to demonstrate the login process. If it doesn’t add value, skip it. Instead, be logged in already and get to the point.

Have your key points outlined

A risk when doing a live demo is going into detail that doesn’t support your key points. Instead, know what your big impact points are…and realize that all other details are the supporting evidence for show how you save time, help them make money, help them be more productive, or whatever you key message(s) are.

Start with your best point first

I did this instinctively in the past, but I like the business case Peter Cohen makes in Great Demo! (great book, BTW!).

Get (and keep!) their attention by solving their biggest problem first. This might mean you’re not demonstrating every feature or demo’ing them “in order.” But you will start with the highest impact ideas, which optimize your ability to keep your virtual audience engaged.

Hope this helps! Peace~

Pen-based input for writing/drawing in webinars

How do I use a sketch tablet in my webinars? I bought a Wacom Bamboo Capture pad but it is clumsy and slow. I would like to use a pen tool to highlight, write, etc. during my presentations. Suggestions? Thanks. Rob

Rob,

Unfortunately my experience trying the same thing was similar with the Bamboo Capture. Frustrated, I put it down and wrote off the $100 as a waste.

There are, however, some happy users…of similar products.

First, I found Rachel Smith’s blog post from last year (great blog, BTW)  and emailed her asking if she’d landed on a favorite. Her response:

To answer your questions, I do have a solution that I love — when I’m at my desk. When I have to travel, it’s still a “make do” kind of situation.  

I’m now using a Wacom Cintiq 24HD at my desk and I adore it. When I don’t need it as a tablet, it functions as an external monitor for my laptop, and it’s big and bright and has great resolution. When I need it as a tablet, I simply pull it towards me, tilt the screen flat, and lower it down until it’s comfortable. The weight of the device still rests on my desk, but the surface is right over my lap and it’s so easy to draw and do graphic recording with the stylus on the tilted surface.

However…. it’s terribly expensive ($2500 or so) and not at all portable — it takes two people to lift it safely. When I’m on the road, I still use the smaller Cintiq (12UX) and just deal with the low resolution (1200 x 800) and small screen real estate. I sometimes use the Bamboo, but it’s so difficult to control compared to the Cintiq that I don’t like to use it for graphic recording.

An up-and-coming (but not quite there yet) option is the iPad. I’m looking forward to the time when the remote desktop control apps are smooth enough and fast enough that I can use the iPad as a wireless tablet. Not quite yet, though. Other than that, I don’t know of a solution between the inexpensive-but-clumsy graphics tablet (Bamboo and similar) and the expensive-but-dreamy LCD tablet (Cintiq and similar). I understand that tablet PCs can be used for the purpose, but I’ve never gotten my hands on one to try it.

And I also know that my design-and-more guy here at 1080 Group, Mike Biewer, loves his Wacom, so I asked his opinion…

 This is why your Bamboo thing stinks for what you’re trying to do: The one you’re using is super small. Inside that little thing it is mapped out so that each pixel on your screen has a pseudo pixel inside the tablet. So the smaller the tablet, the more pixels associated with a point on the tablet. The only way to make it actually work the way you think it should work would be to buy a bigger tablet. I have a 17″ one that maps really well to my dual monitors. 

But I use this thing for everything!!! My ass and back give out before my wrists do. And it writes/draws in Photoshop very well.

So, in short, you need a bigger tablet to make use of it during a presentation without it looking like a 2 year old is writing on the screen. 

Finally, I chatted with my new partner in Austria this morning, Daniel Holzinger of Colited, and found he has been quite happy with using pen-based input with web conferencing. Sadly, I forgot what he told me he was using.

Rob…it looks like we both need to cough up more coin, but I think it’s encouraging that it can be effective.

How much time should you leave for questions?

In a recent webinar, Shelly H. asked, “How much time should you leave for Q&A session at the end of a webinar?”

Shelly, I love the question for one big reason: You’re thinking about interacting with your audience!

I think it depends on the nature of the presentation and presenter.

As you saw in my webinars, I prefer to talk with people during the webinar. I’m entirely committed to ending on time, but it means I often don’t have a lot of time at the end for Q&A. For me, I both pause briefly in the middle of the presentation, and as you saw, I take questions on the fly during the webinar.

To be fair, many presenters aren’t comfortable in the virtual environment, and they’re not comfortable dialoguing with the audience throughout.

In general, if you’re going to have Q&A at the end, I’d err on the side of more time (and have less presentation) for several reasons.

  • Answering questions is a time for personal application. Sometimes the answer to a specific person’s question is as valuable (or more) to them than the rest of the presentation.
  • Questions can clarify something confusing in the presentation. As presenters, we like to think we nail it every time, but sometimes we don’t. Time to “clean up” is useful.
  • Questions are intimate. When you talk at the audience, you could just as well be a recording or broadcast. When you interact with them, you’re being social. Powerful!
  • Questions often bring out mini case-studies. If the presenter has an example s/he can share, it illuminates the topic in a new and sometimes refreshing way.

So, how much time do you want to leave for questions?

Take a guess at how many people you will have attend, then take a guess at how many will submit questions (your webinar solution’s reporting tool may give you stats on how many people asked questions). Finally, estimate how many of those questions you might want to get to and plan enough time to do so.

A final thought: A webinar doesn’t have to be one-size-fits-all. Get creative!

Did you notice that I stuck around after the webinar “ended” to answer more questions? Those went on for another half hour. So we devised a new, upcoming webinar series that is “upside down.” We’re going to have 20 minute webinars with 40 minutes of Q&A.

Depending on what you’re doing, you might host a “panel discussion” that is based on audience questions. Or an “ask the expert” session. Or a facilitated “town hall” discussion.

One thing is for sure…when you are real and personal and interactive with your audience, the connection is more powerful and the experience is more valuable.

Good luck!

What do I do if partners use PowerPoint like documents?

If you can believe it, my new partners insist on writing consulting proposals in PowerPoint, and then using the proposal for the presentation. Any suggestions on how I can convince them to avoid this practice? -Steve H.

Steve, I do believe it.  A couple thoughts:

Pick the right battles
The reality is that people can and do use PowerPoint as documents. Honestly, I’m not going to argue this point…the division I worked in at Microsoft did the same thing. Whether it’s PowerPoint or Word in landscape format or some other software, the key here is that documents are documents…consciously.

Remember that there’s a difference between collaborating and presenting
To be fair, meetings are places where you discuss, collaborate, analyze together, and web conferencing is a great tool for virtual meetings.  The difference between collaborating and presenting is behavioral.  A presentation isn’t a document or even slides, it’s what you do to educate or persuade an audience from a starting situation (Point A) to an outcome or action (Point B).  Yes, it IS confusing that “presentation” has such a broad and indefinite meaning, so focus on the purpose of the communication, not the tools.

Make sure your own presentations demonstrate best practices
As you heard me say in the webinar, create presentations, not documents.  We won’t change the world overnight, but we can be part of the solution, not the problem. The reality is that much of our learning as adults is experiential…and it’s likely your partners are doing something they’ve seen over and over.  It’s like a new golfer learning to play by listening to Uncle Joe who plays every week, but Uncle Joe’s a hack.  The result is perpetuating the badness.

Find your own best process to create presentations and documents/handouts
Here’s what I do…as I outline a presentation, I’m creating the basis for the handout that summarizes the key points I made.  I don’t to have the handout/leave behind mimic every story, every comment, every nuance…it’d be 20 pages long.  Then I transfer the concepts to PowerPoint and start adding the visuals that tell the story.  Sometimes that transfer is word-for-word (like the key points), but much of the time the concept is represented visually (in a way that would read poorly or not-at-all as a document).  In the end I’ve got a presentation that’s the best audio-visual experience I can produce, and I’ve got an document that reads a lot better than someone trying to look at a pile of slides in a .pdf.

Steve, if you’re even asking the question, you’re already on the right track!  Stick with it, and good luck!

What’s a webinar worth? (Part two of two)

In yesterday’s post we explored the first five of ten questions.  See that post for the brief into to why, otherwise read on.

How do you value relationships?
To be fair, some gigs are one-shot events, and it’s not wrong.  But for speakers and buyers alike, the first gig is the most expensive.  It doesn’t mean subsequent events are discounted 90%, but how does relationship fit into the picture?

Lessons learned
One client I’ve been working for consistently for more than four years.  In that time I’ve kept my fees the same despite my company’s healthcare costs going up 40%.  Do I “discount” the price?  No.  Have I consciously decided to make less real money in honor of their loyalty?  Absolutely.  Have I turned down higher paying single gigs to honor that relationship?  Yes.  Who wins?  Everybody.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  to be real, nobody ever books you for a multi-year gig out of the chute…you’re going to have to prove yourself.  Ask yourself two questions:  usually the first gig is more expensive to deliver…how much do you want to give away to prove yourself?  Subsequent gigs may cost you less to deliver, but you’ll also deliver more value because you’ve refined the material, know the audience better, etc.  Are you clear (and communicating) what that value is as it grows?

Buyers:  what’s the ongoing need you have?  Even if the speaker agrees to a cheap price, is it sustainable for either of you?  What might the difference be between someone “doing a gig to get paid” and someone who “goes over the top to deliver value and loyalty?”

How do you/they value the recording or other materials?
Go to any conference and one of the terms for the speakers is that they don’t get to make a recording of their presentation…the conference producers typically reserve that right.  Same goes for attendees (though I’ve never seen anybody get kicked out for holding up a camera).  The message, however, is clear.  This is a time-place activity, and other forms of distribution have other terms.

Lessons learned
Because making a recording of a web-based presentation is push-button simple, buyers often assume that because it’s push-button simple that it’s a given to be included.  What I’ve learned is that my intellectual property has value, and the recorded experience isn’t the same as the live experience.  At a minimum I evaluate exposure of the content and have an additional price for that.  However, there’s another enlightened way to tackle that.

One thing to consider is delivering a rocking, radically experiential live presentation and creating a recording of the same material separately (sans conversations, Q&A, etc.).  I’ve even got several clients for whom I’ve “chunked” that recording into several short, consumable recordings with a special, customized handout.  The real beneficiaries?  The audience.  Live attendees get a learning experience designed for them, and so do the on-demand watchers of the recordings.  The real lesson:  it won’t be valued if it’s not demonstrated to be of value.

One other lesson:  my own content and presentations have evolved a lot (what?  getting better at what I do?  crazy!).  I don’t want too many old recordings floating around.  I always make them a 1-year license unless otherwise negotiated.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  There’s no easy answer.  Is what you deliver easily experienced in a recording?  Is it a sub-par substitute for the real you?  Do you charge a flat-fee or per head?  The former is easy to adjudicate on a recording, the latter gets a LOT more complex.

Buyers:  The value of something isn’t what it costs to make…but that doesn’t mean as the buyer you can’t beat up your speaker for a free recording.  Will it deliver the experience you want?  Will it be ‘good enough?’  As for other materials, remember that the best visual presentations make lousy handouts, and great, well-written handouts make lousy presentation slides.  Is the takeaway for the audience useful?  Or just “get by because that’s what everyone else does?”

How do you/they value leads?
Some speaking engagements, and likewise some webinars/webcasts, may offer an opportunity for the speaker to get the registrant list.

Lessons learned
If I had a nickel for every time I heard a potential booking agent tell me how much exposure I’d get, I’d be writing this blog post from a yacht somewhere warmer than Portland, Oregon.  That said, all my business is either from someone who’s seen me walk my talk or a referral from someone who’s seen me walk my talk.  The reality, speaking a lot is the best way to get more speaking business.  Here’s another reality…you have to know your core audience.  I cater to medium and large businesses because I’m the most expensive guy in my industry, while about 94% of companies in the U.S. have 15 or fewer employees.  I love little companies (I own one), and I sincerely appreciate each time they spend $20 on amazon.com or send me a nice note.  But they don’t hire me.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  The biggest question is, “If you get leads, do you have a system for following up and monetizing them?”  If you don’t, they’re worth nothing.  If you do, what percentage of those leads are in your target market, and what’s your hit/close rate for monetizing them.  Figure that out, and you’ll know what they’re worth.

Buyers:  It’s a nice offer, but be careful with it.  Is it of value?  You might be able to get them to lower their asking price.  It isn’t?  Then you’re negotiating with no leverage.

What’s your/their benchmark for a “successful” webinar?
Here’s the painful reality.  Most webinar skills are learned like golf skills…from Uncle Joe (and Uncle Joe’s a hack, but he happens to know more than me, so I hack, too).  I hate to say it, but even the ‘models’ delivered by most conferencing companies are sub-par.  Why?  Because they do it for lead generation…and they don’t tell a speaker to go away if they can draw a crowd but suck in a virtual presentation.  The second reason is that in most cases conferencing companies’ webinars are produced by people who are execution/operational, not kick-ass presenters.  This is NOT a denigration (please hear me clearly)…it’s the reality of the business model.  Software companies are in the software operation business, not the presentation excellence business.

Similarly, blog posts tend to be dangerously shallow, telling you what, but not necessarily why and how.  There’s no “7 tips to get rich” anywhere in the world, and while someone may glean great tidbits from blog posts, they’re no substitute for a deep learning experience.

Lessons learned
The word “educate” comes from the Latin meaning “to draw out.”  In other words, you have to meet people where they are.  Some do just want a few tips, and there’s nothing wrong with that.  But life- and business-changing professional development don’t happen overnight.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  What are you going to do to get your chops in shape?  Trial and error?  Learn from somebody?  Read a book?

Buyers:  Do you want champagne on a beer budget?  (It’s okay, we all do!)  Have you established what’s important to you, your negotiable and non-negotiables?  The better you can articulate what you need, the better you’ll find the balance in the quality-price tension we all deal with.

Finally, the big one…what’s your/their experience with hybrid events?
Recently I was watching a special about the early days of the Ed Sullivan Show, and I was amazed at how a (then) very young Mick Jagger made serious eye contact with the camera…in between times of making eye contact with the audience.

The single hardest presentation scenario is trying to engage two different audiences having two different experiences.  You have two places to look, engage, and interact.

Lessons learned
The reality:  meeting planners and conferences are under tremendous pressure to reach more audiences and monetize them.  More common in terms of frequency, there’s a corporate habit of a team that’s in the same building filing into a conference room to gather around a desk phone and project something on a screen.  Either way, you’ve got the same problem that takes even more skill to pull off well.

Questions to ask
Speakers:  Will there be a mixed audience?  If so, how will you take questions?  If you’ve got handouts, who gets what and how?  If those attendees online are multitasking through a one-camera broadcast that doesn’t otherwise engage them, how might that affect their willingness to respond to your marketing follow up (if you get the leads)?

Buyers:  Frankly, most speakers are pretty naive here, meaning you’ve got an opportunity.  I’d be more concerned with answering, “How is this speaker going to make sure those remote attendees felt included and like they got their money’s worth?”

Bottom line

Speakers:  if you don’t know where to start, begin by charging the same price for your online presentation as you would in person.  Doing so communicates that you see value in what you deliver, not where you deliver it.  Then, using the ideas in these 10 questions, you can figure out where to adjust.

Buyers:  just like the publishing industry has struggled with how to charge for content online (and many have found how to do it quite nicely), remember that online doesn’t mean free.  It also doesn’t mean that you have to accept the same old thing…in fact, you shouldn’t.  Demand that the online version of a presentation has it’s own unique value to your audience.

Continuing the rock band analogy, some bands are great live, but their recordings aren’t so hot.  Conversely, some make great recordings, but their live shows are lackluster.  Moving a presentation from offline to online similarly transforms the experience for presenter and audience alike.  When it really clicks, it’s a boon for both speakers and buyers of speaking/training services…uniquely powerful in the overall mix of doing business.

When it doesn’t, well… pass the No-Doz.

Good luck!

What’s a webinar worth? (Part one of two)

One of the most frequently asked questions I get is, “How much can I charge for a webinar?”  Usually the question is asked by trainers or speakers, but I also frequently speak to purchasers of their services struggling with the same thing.  The result:  one big mess.

Pricing, by definition, is a “what the market will bear” proposition.  Speakers, like writers, are a dime a dozen.  There are more who want to make it than have made it.  Supply is often greater than demand.

That said, here in part one are five of ten questions that sellers of their speaking/training services should consider to optimize their revenue.  And buyers of those services can use to better evaluate (if not negotiate) those deals when hiring a speaker for a webinar, webcast, or virtual classroom session.

What’s your/their business model?
The classic speaking business model has three parts:  speaking fees, products (perhaps for back of room sales), and follow-up consulting/training.  Some speakers speak for free to get leads because they want to sell you their services.  Some charge for speaking because it’s an irreplaceable experience.

Lessons learned
As an old timer in the web conferencing industry, I spent years selling/marketing professional services from startup to Microsoft to startup (that we sold to Intercall).  The goal of someone selling services is to tell you why you want to continue to use their services…it’s how they grow their business.  Now, however, 1080 Group is purely education, and it changes the dynamic of what you’re motivated to do.

Question to explore
Speakers:  What’s your business model?  Is it speaking for exposure?  To sell books?  To get other gigs?  If you don’t know your mix, you’re going to struggle with moving it online.  It’s not wrong to mix them, but it does change your motivation in terms of where you place emphasis.

Buyers:  Regardless of their content, does their business model align with how you want/need to serve your constituents?  Are they willing to change?  Would you want them to?  Is what they offer a one-trick pony, or can it be tailored to what you need?

What’s your/their delivered experience?
Our brains are both cognitive and affective…knowledge/fact oriented and emotional/experiential.  Some things you get in a book, and some things you can’t learn that way (or learn much better some other way).

Lessons learned
Now I’m purely in the experiential education business.  I teach people how to do it themselves, not why they want to hire me to do it for them.  You can get a piece of my brain and the 700+ virtual presentations I’ve made for $20 on amazon.com, but I know what I deliver.  It’s not just about content, it’s about experience.  By analogy, the last time I dropped $18 on a CD, I also spent $120 to go to the concert.

Here’s how I know what I do is highly experiential…because nobody who contacts 1080 Group is “just starting” webinars and trying to figure out where to start.  They start by getting a piece of software and they don’t even know the right questions to ask.  Those who call are like the government agency in the UK I talked to yesterday who said, “We’ve tried it, but now we’ve figured out it’s just not the same as training face-to-face and we need some help.”  As we’ve learned to quip, “Microsoft will teach you how to use Word, but they don’t teach you to be a writer.”

Question to explore
Speakers:  If you want to deliver an experience, have you adapted to a new medium?  So that it enables instead of inhibits great connections?

Buyers:  Is it JUST about content?  If so (to play devil’s advocate), why are you even doing a live gig?  Couldn’t a DVD or ebook serve that purpose? Make your speakers send you a recording (or at least convincingly articulate how they’re going to deliver the goods).

Is your/their material made-for-webinar/webcast or the same stuff in a new medium?
Transmission or medium theory of communications suggests that the medium affects how messages are delivered and understood.  It’s obvious if we say, “You can tell a story in a book or in a movie,” but it’s less obvious when we move our voices and PowerPoint from face-to-face to online.

The sad truth is that many (if not most) webinars are delivering broadcasts that are way worse experiences than what we’ve grown accustomed to culturally (e.g., television, movies).  They’re neither visually engaging, nor do they take advantage of the fact that they’re live (When you go to an in-person “seminar,” do you expect a non-interactive lecture?  Not usually).

Lessons learned
I got an email recently from an instructional designer at a university in Iowa saying, “I missed your live webinar, and wow!, I was actually engaged during the recording…and that’s hard to do!”  We’re all visual creatures, and we’re used to talking to people, but we don’t do it.  It doesn’t have to be that way, we just need some new skills (which, by the way, aren’t “software skills”).

Questions to explore
Speakers:   If you’re going to talk at people and 45 minutes later ask, “Questions?”, your webinars will fail to inspire.  What’s it going to take to adapt to a new medium and deliver with the same power and grace you’re used to delivering?

Buyers:    People multitask more in front of a screen.  It’s how we’re cultured.  Even if it’s a knowledge-rich event, will the speaker keep people engaged so that audience cognition and retention are optimized?

Is your/their presentation cookie-cutter or customized?
Ask any professional speaker their secrets of success, and one of the things they’ll say is that they study their audience, their idioms, politics, and business.  And then they tailor their presentation.  As a full and active member of National Speakers Association, I can assure you it’s what they’re teaching.  The challenge, if you want to be a pro, is that customization you provide takes time…a lot.  If you’re a buyer, you’ve got the same challenge.

Lessons learned
Often I’ll get a call from someone who says, “I just saw you do X, how much to do that very same thing for my organization?”  And then I take out my “some will some won’t” piece of paper that has a line drawn down the middle of it.  Some people will get it that it takes a lot of freaking time to really dial in a presentation.  By analogy, a house looks like a house when the frame goes up and the drywall goes on, but it’s the finish work that takes time and expense.  On the other side of paper is the “some won’t,” in which case I don’t spend a lot of time trying to convince them.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  if “same” is okay, it’s not wrong.  Just know where you fit relative to your competition and value delivered.  But you better get clear, because your business model demands it.

Buyers:  if “same” is okay, it’s not wrong.  Does the speaker offer to get to know your audience and organization?  Can they offer practical ways they’re going to tailor their presentation and experience for your audience?  Just know what you’re getting.  There’s a reason superstars are superstars, and it’s not because they’re cookie-cutter.

Is your/their pricing based on price or value?
All buyers make decisions on price until they see the value.  The challenge for speakers and buyers alike is that it’s hard to quantify value and experience times two.  One version of experience is that which is delivered.  One is the depth of knowledge and experience the speaker brings to the table which, assuming there’s a dialogue instead of a broadcast, adds a richness to the experience that is hard to duplicate.

Lessons learned
I had a client tell me recently they sat through a product training class from one of the biggie web conferencing providers where the trainer wouldn’t answer her question.  I asked her, “Do you think they were being rude or just didn’t know the answer?”, watching the lightbulb go on in her virtual head.  The reality for all of us that it’s not just what the instructor knows when we sit in a class, it’s sometimes the ability for us to ask a question for clarification, context, or personal application.  For some of us, that answer is as important as much of the rest of the content delivered.  Worth noting, just because someone calls themselves a guru doesn’t mean they are (swing a deceased feline around Twitter for 20 seconds and you’ll smack a pile of them).

Questions to explore
Speakers:  Can you articulate how your experience will benefit the organization in question?  Have some examples ready about how, during or after a presentation, you delivered value.

Buyers:  How are you valuing the “beyond the objectives” depth that the speaker brings to table?  It’s hard to put a number on it, but real experience has those on-the-fly anecdotes and how-to comments that add a dimension you may otherwise be missing.

Questions about what to do about recordings, mixed/hybrid events, and more?  Stay tuned for Part Two tomorrow.

Q&A: What if I have no control over design?

In a recent webinar, Judy Z asked, “What about those of us who have no control in the design of the class?”

Judy, unfortunately there are always limits imposed in most organizations…and you have to pick your battles.

It’s a bit simplistic, but I suggest drawing a line down the middle of a piece of paper, labeling one column “some will” and the other “some won’t.”

Sometimes others in the organization are open to evidence about how design can positively (or negatively) affect attention, cognition, and retention of learners.

And sometimes they don’t want to know, don’t want to change, or don’t care enough to want to know or change.

It’s a “company politics” thought, but you might benefit from identifying peers in the “some will” category and begin sharing with them the evidence and examples that support the case for design as a key component in how your learners learn.

One or two things will happen.

First, at very least you will get clearer and stronger in your own conviction.  You may not affect the change you want entirely, but you will find ways to apply what you’ve learned.

Two, you may succeed, even slowly, in improving what comes from the instructional designers or whomever is giving you the material.  And everybody wins!

Page 1 of 612345»...Last »