Archive - Online vs. Offline RSS Feed

What’s a webinar worth? (Part two of two)

In yesterday’s post we explored the first five of ten questions.  See that post for the brief into to why, otherwise read on.

How do you value relationships?
To be fair, some gigs are one-shot events, and it’s not wrong.  But for speakers and buyers alike, the first gig is the most expensive.  It doesn’t mean subsequent events are discounted 90%, but how does relationship fit into the picture?

Lessons learned
One client I’ve been working for consistently for more than four years.  In that time I’ve kept my fees the same despite my company’s healthcare costs going up 40%.  Do I “discount” the price?  No.  Have I consciously decided to make less real money in honor of their loyalty?  Absolutely.  Have I turned down higher paying single gigs to honor that relationship?  Yes.  Who wins?  Everybody.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  to be real, nobody ever books you for a multi-year gig out of the chute…you’re going to have to prove yourself.  Ask yourself two questions:  usually the first gig is more expensive to deliver…how much do you want to give away to prove yourself?  Subsequent gigs may cost you less to deliver, but you’ll also deliver more value because you’ve refined the material, know the audience better, etc.  Are you clear (and communicating) what that value is as it grows?

Buyers:  what’s the ongoing need you have?  Even if the speaker agrees to a cheap price, is it sustainable for either of you?  What might the difference be between someone “doing a gig to get paid” and someone who “goes over the top to deliver value and loyalty?”

How do you/they value the recording or other materials?
Go to any conference and one of the terms for the speakers is that they don’t get to make a recording of their presentation…the conference producers typically reserve that right.  Same goes for attendees (though I’ve never seen anybody get kicked out for holding up a camera).  The message, however, is clear.  This is a time-place activity, and other forms of distribution have other terms.

Lessons learned
Because making a recording of a web-based presentation is push-button simple, buyers often assume that because it’s push-button simple that it’s a given to be included.  What I’ve learned is that my intellectual property has value, and the recorded experience isn’t the same as the live experience.  At a minimum I evaluate exposure of the content and have an additional price for that.  However, there’s another enlightened way to tackle that.

One thing to consider is delivering a rocking, radically experiential live presentation and creating a recording of the same material separately (sans conversations, Q&A, etc.).  I’ve even got several clients for whom I’ve “chunked” that recording into several short, consumable recordings with a special, customized handout.  The real beneficiaries?  The audience.  Live attendees get a learning experience designed for them, and so do the on-demand watchers of the recordings.  The real lesson:  it won’t be valued if it’s not demonstrated to be of value.

One other lesson:  my own content and presentations have evolved a lot (what?  getting better at what I do?  crazy!).  I don’t want too many old recordings floating around.  I always make them a 1-year license unless otherwise negotiated.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  There’s no easy answer.  Is what you deliver easily experienced in a recording?  Is it a sub-par substitute for the real you?  Do you charge a flat-fee or per head?  The former is easy to adjudicate on a recording, the latter gets a LOT more complex.

Buyers:  The value of something isn’t what it costs to make…but that doesn’t mean as the buyer you can’t beat up your speaker for a free recording.  Will it deliver the experience you want?  Will it be ‘good enough?’  As for other materials, remember that the best visual presentations make lousy handouts, and great, well-written handouts make lousy presentation slides.  Is the takeaway for the audience useful?  Or just “get by because that’s what everyone else does?”

How do you/they value leads?
Some speaking engagements, and likewise some webinars/webcasts, may offer an opportunity for the speaker to get the registrant list.

Lessons learned
If I had a nickel for every time I heard a potential booking agent tell me how much exposure I’d get, I’d be writing this blog post from a yacht somewhere warmer than Portland, Oregon.  That said, all my business is either from someone who’s seen me walk my talk or a referral from someone who’s seen me walk my talk.  The reality, speaking a lot is the best way to get more speaking business.  Here’s another reality…you have to know your core audience.  I cater to medium and large businesses because I’m the most expensive guy in my industry, while about 94% of companies in the U.S. have 15 or fewer employees.  I love little companies (I own one), and I sincerely appreciate each time they spend $20 on amazon.com or send me a nice note.  But they don’t hire me.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  The biggest question is, “If you get leads, do you have a system for following up and monetizing them?”  If you don’t, they’re worth nothing.  If you do, what percentage of those leads are in your target market, and what’s your hit/close rate for monetizing them.  Figure that out, and you’ll know what they’re worth.

Buyers:  It’s a nice offer, but be careful with it.  Is it of value?  You might be able to get them to lower their asking price.  It isn’t?  Then you’re negotiating with no leverage.

What’s your/their benchmark for a “successful” webinar?
Here’s the painful reality.  Most webinar skills are learned like golf skills…from Uncle Joe (and Uncle Joe’s a hack, but he happens to know more than me, so I hack, too).  I hate to say it, but even the ‘models’ delivered by most conferencing companies are sub-par.  Why?  Because they do it for lead generation…and they don’t tell a speaker to go away if they can draw a crowd but suck in a virtual presentation.  The second reason is that in most cases conferencing companies’ webinars are produced by people who are execution/operational, not kick-ass presenters.  This is NOT a denigration (please hear me clearly)…it’s the reality of the business model.  Software companies are in the software operation business, not the presentation excellence business.

Similarly, blog posts tend to be dangerously shallow, telling you what, but not necessarily why and how.  There’s no “7 tips to get rich” anywhere in the world, and while someone may glean great tidbits from blog posts, they’re no substitute for a deep learning experience.

Lessons learned
The word “educate” comes from the Latin meaning “to draw out.”  In other words, you have to meet people where they are.  Some do just want a few tips, and there’s nothing wrong with that.  But life- and business-changing professional development don’t happen overnight.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  What are you going to do to get your chops in shape?  Trial and error?  Learn from somebody?  Read a book?

Buyers:  Do you want champagne on a beer budget?  (It’s okay, we all do!)  Have you established what’s important to you, your negotiable and non-negotiables?  The better you can articulate what you need, the better you’ll find the balance in the quality-price tension we all deal with.

Finally, the big one…what’s your/their experience with hybrid events?
Recently I was watching a special about the early days of the Ed Sullivan Show, and I was amazed at how a (then) very young Mick Jagger made serious eye contact with the camera…in between times of making eye contact with the audience.

The single hardest presentation scenario is trying to engage two different audiences having two different experiences.  You have two places to look, engage, and interact.

Lessons learned
The reality:  meeting planners and conferences are under tremendous pressure to reach more audiences and monetize them.  More common in terms of frequency, there’s a corporate habit of a team that’s in the same building filing into a conference room to gather around a desk phone and project something on a screen.  Either way, you’ve got the same problem that takes even more skill to pull off well.

Questions to ask
Speakers:  Will there be a mixed audience?  If so, how will you take questions?  If you’ve got handouts, who gets what and how?  If those attendees online are multitasking through a one-camera broadcast that doesn’t otherwise engage them, how might that affect their willingness to respond to your marketing follow up (if you get the leads)?

Buyers:  Frankly, most speakers are pretty naive here, meaning you’ve got an opportunity.  I’d be more concerned with answering, “How is this speaker going to make sure those remote attendees felt included and like they got their money’s worth?”

Bottom line

Speakers:  if you don’t know where to start, begin by charging the same price for your online presentation as you would in person.  Doing so communicates that you see value in what you deliver, not where you deliver it.  Then, using the ideas in these 10 questions, you can figure out where to adjust.

Buyers:  just like the publishing industry has struggled with how to charge for content online (and many have found how to do it quite nicely), remember that online doesn’t mean free.  It also doesn’t mean that you have to accept the same old thing…in fact, you shouldn’t.  Demand that the online version of a presentation has it’s own unique value to your audience.

Continuing the rock band analogy, some bands are great live, but their recordings aren’t so hot.  Conversely, some make great recordings, but their live shows are lackluster.  Moving a presentation from offline to online similarly transforms the experience for presenter and audience alike.  When it really clicks, it’s a boon for both speakers and buyers of speaking/training services…uniquely powerful in the overall mix of doing business.

When it doesn’t, well… pass the No-Doz.

Good luck!

What’s a webinar worth? (Part one of two)

One of the most frequently asked questions I get is, “How much can I charge for a webinar?”  Usually the question is asked by trainers or speakers, but I also frequently speak to purchasers of their services struggling with the same thing.  The result:  one big mess.

Pricing, by definition, is a “what the market will bear” proposition.  Speakers, like writers, are a dime a dozen.  There are more who want to make it than have made it.  Supply is often greater than demand.

That said, here in part one are five of ten questions that sellers of their speaking/training services should consider to optimize their revenue.  And buyers of those services can use to better evaluate (if not negotiate) those deals when hiring a speaker for a webinar, webcast, or virtual classroom session.

What’s your/their business model?
The classic speaking business model has three parts:  speaking fees, products (perhaps for back of room sales), and follow-up consulting/training.  Some speakers speak for free to get leads because they want to sell you their services.  Some charge for speaking because it’s an irreplaceable experience.

Lessons learned
As an old timer in the web conferencing industry, I spent years selling/marketing professional services from startup to Microsoft to startup (that we sold to Intercall).  The goal of someone selling services is to tell you why you want to continue to use their services…it’s how they grow their business.  Now, however, 1080 Group is purely education, and it changes the dynamic of what you’re motivated to do.

Question to explore
Speakers:  What’s your business model?  Is it speaking for exposure?  To sell books?  To get other gigs?  If you don’t know your mix, you’re going to struggle with moving it online.  It’s not wrong to mix them, but it does change your motivation in terms of where you place emphasis.

Buyers:  Regardless of their content, does their business model align with how you want/need to serve your constituents?  Are they willing to change?  Would you want them to?  Is what they offer a one-trick pony, or can it be tailored to what you need?

What’s your/their delivered experience?
Our brains are both cognitive and affective…knowledge/fact oriented and emotional/experiential.  Some things you get in a book, and some things you can’t learn that way (or learn much better some other way).

Lessons learned
Now I’m purely in the experiential education business.  I teach people how to do it themselves, not why they want to hire me to do it for them.  You can get a piece of my brain and the 700+ virtual presentations I’ve made for $20 on amazon.com, but I know what I deliver.  It’s not just about content, it’s about experience.  By analogy, the last time I dropped $18 on a CD, I also spent $120 to go to the concert.

Here’s how I know what I do is highly experiential…because nobody who contacts 1080 Group is “just starting” webinars and trying to figure out where to start.  They start by getting a piece of software and they don’t even know the right questions to ask.  Those who call are like the government agency in the UK I talked to yesterday who said, “We’ve tried it, but now we’ve figured out it’s just not the same as training face-to-face and we need some help.”  As we’ve learned to quip, “Microsoft will teach you how to use Word, but they don’t teach you to be a writer.”

Question to explore
Speakers:  If you want to deliver an experience, have you adapted to a new medium?  So that it enables instead of inhibits great connections?

Buyers:  Is it JUST about content?  If so (to play devil’s advocate), why are you even doing a live gig?  Couldn’t a DVD or ebook serve that purpose? Make your speakers send you a recording (or at least convincingly articulate how they’re going to deliver the goods).

Is your/their material made-for-webinar/webcast or the same stuff in a new medium?
Transmission or medium theory of communications suggests that the medium affects how messages are delivered and understood.  It’s obvious if we say, “You can tell a story in a book or in a movie,” but it’s less obvious when we move our voices and PowerPoint from face-to-face to online.

The sad truth is that many (if not most) webinars are delivering broadcasts that are way worse experiences than what we’ve grown accustomed to culturally (e.g., television, movies).  They’re neither visually engaging, nor do they take advantage of the fact that they’re live (When you go to an in-person “seminar,” do you expect a non-interactive lecture?  Not usually).

Lessons learned
I got an email recently from an instructional designer at a university in Iowa saying, “I missed your live webinar, and wow!, I was actually engaged during the recording…and that’s hard to do!”  We’re all visual creatures, and we’re used to talking to people, but we don’t do it.  It doesn’t have to be that way, we just need some new skills (which, by the way, aren’t “software skills”).

Questions to explore
Speakers:   If you’re going to talk at people and 45 minutes later ask, “Questions?”, your webinars will fail to inspire.  What’s it going to take to adapt to a new medium and deliver with the same power and grace you’re used to delivering?

Buyers:    People multitask more in front of a screen.  It’s how we’re cultured.  Even if it’s a knowledge-rich event, will the speaker keep people engaged so that audience cognition and retention are optimized?

Is your/their presentation cookie-cutter or customized?
Ask any professional speaker their secrets of success, and one of the things they’ll say is that they study their audience, their idioms, politics, and business.  And then they tailor their presentation.  As a full and active member of National Speakers Association, I can assure you it’s what they’re teaching.  The challenge, if you want to be a pro, is that customization you provide takes time…a lot.  If you’re a buyer, you’ve got the same challenge.

Lessons learned
Often I’ll get a call from someone who says, “I just saw you do X, how much to do that very same thing for my organization?”  And then I take out my “some will some won’t” piece of paper that has a line drawn down the middle of it.  Some people will get it that it takes a lot of freaking time to really dial in a presentation.  By analogy, a house looks like a house when the frame goes up and the drywall goes on, but it’s the finish work that takes time and expense.  On the other side of paper is the “some won’t,” in which case I don’t spend a lot of time trying to convince them.

Questions to explore
Speakers:  if “same” is okay, it’s not wrong.  Just know where you fit relative to your competition and value delivered.  But you better get clear, because your business model demands it.

Buyers:  if “same” is okay, it’s not wrong.  Does the speaker offer to get to know your audience and organization?  Can they offer practical ways they’re going to tailor their presentation and experience for your audience?  Just know what you’re getting.  There’s a reason superstars are superstars, and it’s not because they’re cookie-cutter.

Is your/their pricing based on price or value?
All buyers make decisions on price until they see the value.  The challenge for speakers and buyers alike is that it’s hard to quantify value and experience times two.  One version of experience is that which is delivered.  One is the depth of knowledge and experience the speaker brings to the table which, assuming there’s a dialogue instead of a broadcast, adds a richness to the experience that is hard to duplicate.

Lessons learned
I had a client tell me recently they sat through a product training class from one of the biggie web conferencing providers where the trainer wouldn’t answer her question.  I asked her, “Do you think they were being rude or just didn’t know the answer?”, watching the lightbulb go on in her virtual head.  The reality for all of us that it’s not just what the instructor knows when we sit in a class, it’s sometimes the ability for us to ask a question for clarification, context, or personal application.  For some of us, that answer is as important as much of the rest of the content delivered.  Worth noting, just because someone calls themselves a guru doesn’t mean they are (swing a deceased feline around Twitter for 20 seconds and you’ll smack a pile of them).

Questions to explore
Speakers:  Can you articulate how your experience will benefit the organization in question?  Have some examples ready about how, during or after a presentation, you delivered value.

Buyers:  How are you valuing the “beyond the objectives” depth that the speaker brings to table?  It’s hard to put a number on it, but real experience has those on-the-fly anecdotes and how-to comments that add a dimension you may otherwise be missing.

Questions about what to do about recordings, mixed/hybrid events, and more?  Stay tuned for Part Two tomorrow.

How presenting live, via the web, is different. An intro.

One of the biggest problems with presenting online is a failure to adapt to the medium.  Over and over I see experienced presenters, whether public speaking pros or senior corporate execs, deliver LAME online presentations because they either don’t see it or they fail to heed it.

And that’s the passion behind this blog.

Of the many examples:

  • Offline you read the room by watching and eye contact, online you read the room by looking at tools.
  • Offline if you use bullet points, people sleep in their chairs.  Online they log out.
  • Offline you’re taught to use very few slides.  Online you’re dead if you don’t use a lot of slides (don’t choke ~ call me or stay tuned, I’ll explain).
  • Offline the corporate .ppt pros remember take the room into consideration.  But the corporate .ppt pros forget to take the online “room” into consideration.
  • Offline .ppt builds work great.  Online they should be used sparingly (and there are other ways to achieve the same effect).

You get the idea.  And if I have anything to do with it, you’ll become a rock star.

The medium changes the game.  Don’t suck.  Embrace the medium.