Archive - Presentation Delivery RSS Feed

What would Spock say about video conferencing?

As Spock put it, “Insufficient facts always invite danger.” 

So, what do 1200 people say they want to see in a video conference?

Hint: There’s a difference between what we’re doing and what they said.

I confess I’m a little late in posting this, but last summer I had the privilege of conducting an extensive, worldwide survey of video conferencing leaders and attendees.

The result: There’s a difference between what we think we’re doing well and what attendees think we’re doing well. Interestingly-but-not-surprisingly, different parts of the world have different opinions about what drives value for their organizations (organisations? :) ).

This paper, sponsored by Citrix Online (@GoToMeeting), explores the behavioral aspects of effective virtual meetings. As I’m sure you can appreciate, getting the paper requires registration.

Enjoy. And prosper.

Suggestions for combining live visuals in a webinar presentation

Jahna in Australia asked…”This presentation is PPT slide – any suggestions for combining live visuals?  Does this assist connection and involvement?”

Jahna, I see from the time stamp of this question that you asked this prior to me doing a live desktop demonstration.

Here, however, are a couple tips for doing live desktop sharing using web conferencing:

Spare your audience any steps that aren’t critical

For example, if you log in using a user name and password, it might be worth sparing your audience the time it takes for you to demonstrate the login process. If it doesn’t add value, skip it. Instead, be logged in already and get to the point.

Have your key points outlined

A risk when doing a live demo is going into detail that doesn’t support your key points. Instead, know what your big impact points are…and realize that all other details are the supporting evidence for show how you save time, help them make money, help them be more productive, or whatever you key message(s) are.

Start with your best point first

I did this instinctively in the past, but I like the business case Peter Cohen makes in Great Demo! (great book, BTW!).

Get (and keep!) their attention by solving their biggest problem first. This might mean you’re not demonstrating every feature or demo’ing them “in order.” But you will start with the highest impact ideas, which optimize your ability to keep your virtual audience engaged.

Hope this helps! Peace~

How much time should you leave for questions?

In a recent webinar, Shelly H. asked, “How much time should you leave for Q&A session at the end of a webinar?”

Shelly, I love the question for one big reason: You’re thinking about interacting with your audience!

I think it depends on the nature of the presentation and presenter.

As you saw in my webinars, I prefer to talk with people during the webinar. I’m entirely committed to ending on time, but it means I often don’t have a lot of time at the end for Q&A. For me, I both pause briefly in the middle of the presentation, and as you saw, I take questions on the fly during the webinar.

To be fair, many presenters aren’t comfortable in the virtual environment, and they’re not comfortable dialoguing with the audience throughout.

In general, if you’re going to have Q&A at the end, I’d err on the side of more time (and have less presentation) for several reasons.

  • Answering questions is a time for personal application. Sometimes the answer to a specific person’s question is as valuable (or more) to them than the rest of the presentation.
  • Questions can clarify something confusing in the presentation. As presenters, we like to think we nail it every time, but sometimes we don’t. Time to “clean up” is useful.
  • Questions are intimate. When you talk at the audience, you could just as well be a recording or broadcast. When you interact with them, you’re being social. Powerful!
  • Questions often bring out mini case-studies. If the presenter has an example s/he can share, it illuminates the topic in a new and sometimes refreshing way.

So, how much time do you want to leave for questions?

Take a guess at how many people you will have attend, then take a guess at how many will submit questions (your webinar solution’s reporting tool may give you stats on how many people asked questions). Finally, estimate how many of those questions you might want to get to and plan enough time to do so.

A final thought: A webinar doesn’t have to be one-size-fits-all. Get creative!

Did you notice that I stuck around after the webinar “ended” to answer more questions? Those went on for another half hour. So we devised a new, upcoming webinar series that is “upside down.” We’re going to have 20 minute webinars with 40 minutes of Q&A.

Depending on what you’re doing, you might host a “panel discussion” that is based on audience questions. Or an “ask the expert” session. Or a facilitated “town hall” discussion.

One thing is for sure…when you are real and personal and interactive with your audience, the connection is more powerful and the experience is more valuable.

Good luck!

Five tips for Q&A in your webinars

Editor’s Note: Today’s guest post is from Maranda Gibson, the AccuConference socialite, blogger, and writer. If you appreciate people who keep the ‘social’ in social media as I do, you may appreciate connecting with her where we met…on Twitter (@accuconference). 

One of the (many) fun things about working for AccuConference is getting the opportunity to sit on conference calls with my clients. There are times when I’m the moderator for the conference and take care of introductions and advancing the slides. There have been plenty of times where I’ve just been on the call to monitor because a customer wanted some back up. Being able to sit on these conferences has given me a unique opportunity to see how some of our clients are encouraging their participants to get involved. I’ve seen some of my customers get great feedback, so I thought I would share some of their secrets to getting feedback during and after your next webinar.

Ask for It
If no one knows you are going to want questions at the end the participants may not be taking note on what they would like more information about. The most important thing you can do is budget some time at the end of your webinar for Q&A – most of the time people will have a question or a comment and you want to give them an opportunity to ask.

Give Them Options
We all love Twitter and Facebook right? Give your participants all of the options possible to submit questions.  Some participants might feel shy and therefore don’t want to speak up on the conference but still submit their question in a different venue.  The popularity of Twitter gives a unique opportunity here and can essentially turn your webinar into a chat where your participants are sharing information on their own.  Set up a hash tag and send that out on the invitations and be sure to put someone in charge of monitoring that stream.

Take Question Breaks
I have one customer who takes a break every 5-7 slide changes since the conferences usually last about two hours long.  There’s a lot of information flying at the participants and it is important to make sure that they are able to keep up.  This is also an effective solution when you are dealing with multiple speakers.  You can take a break each time there is a speaker change and let participants ask questions to each speaker while the information is fresh on their minds.

Be Prepared
Maybe you’ve covered everything by the end of the call and the participants have no questions – this makes you feel really smart, but now you have 20 minutes that was allocated for Q&A that is open.  Have a good back up plan and use this time to announce upcoming events, do any housekeeping items, or opening the floor for questions about something that doesn’t pertain to the topic of the webinar. Silence is not always golden.

Plant a Sleeper
Okay, this may sound shady, but I don’t think it is. Great question and answer sessions can be held back if you have a lot of participants who are on the shy side of things.  Have someone join in as a participant to ask the first question – and make it a good one. This isn’t to look “good” but it’s to break the ice.  Sometimes it’s hard to step up and be the first one to speak up and if all of your participants feel this way you could miss out on some great questions.

So there you go.  These are five things I’ve observed in my experience on webinars that increase the Q&A response. Q&A is one of the most important parts of the presentations because it’s where your participants get involved – what works? What doesn’t? How do you get people to respond when you are ready to take questions?

 

Roger’s Note
AccuConference provides conference call and webinar services, and Maranda provides tips on public speaking, hosting, and general communications (and, graciously, guest posts like this). 1080 Group does not take referral fees from conferencing vendors and there are no affiliate fees associated with this link.


Q&A: should a webinar presenter stand up?

From a recent webinar, Bryan L. asked, “Should the presenter deliver the audio standing up to help resonance rather than sitting?”

Bryan, I stand up.  I love the energy, and truth be told, if you were in my office you’d see me waving my arms and walking around.

Here are a few things to think about:

How much contact do you need with your web conferencing system via the computer?

I purposefully have simple slides with one idea each, so I don’t use, for instance, annotation tools except in rare circumstances (e.g., demonstrating them).

I also am platform-agnostic.  My company is purely in the education business and we don’t sell web/audio/video conferencing or services, so I’ve adapted to be prepared for whatever conferencing platform my client is providing.  This doesn’t mean I don’t tackle platform-specific tactics when I’m working with a client privately, but in a public webinar like the one you attended I plan content to be applicable to the most people in the audience, regardless of what conferencing solution they’re using.  Takeaway:  I don’t spend as much time using/demonstrating “hand-up” or other features that they may or may not have.

It also depends on the type of session you’re delivering.  A broader lead-generation webinar often doesn’t require the same hands-on types of exercises you might use in a training session where you’re teaching managers a new software application.

What’s your office setup?

Me, I walk away from the computer, come back, push the next slide button (frequently!), and then when I do need to do something hands-on, I sit down.  Then I’ll stand up again.  While I don’t have a raised surface in my office now, when I was at Microsoft I had one section of my cube desk raised so I could stand at it…it was the best setup I’ve had.  If you can do this, it might be the best of both worlds

Finally, if you do sit down, what’s your posture? A few tips:

Sit up straight. It’s basic, but it’s important to letting your lungs/diaphragm/voice do the best they can do.

Put your feet flat on the floor – apart. Don’t cross your legs…it contributes to a constricting “closed” posture and generally tightens you up.

Breathe. As I often quip, we can’t change the voices we were born with, but we can change how well we use what we were born with.  See this post for more on this and a few other pre-conference tips.

Want optimum energy?  Stand up when you present at webinars.

When should you NOT use interactivity in a webinar?

Is there ever a time not to use the interactivity tools provided by a web conferencing solution?

To be sure, in most cases you should push yourself to use more and more interactivity as your audience has less distance to travel to Distraction Avenue. I’m not saying it won’t feel artificial sometimes to ask a question, but your goal for that question, poll, or ‘hand up’ may well be to demonstrate that you will be interacting with the audience. This is a powerful message if you need them to engage – and you probably do if your goal is to educate and influence and outcome.

But the worst thing you can do is lose one precious moment working on something that doesn’t support your presentation goals…to communicate with the audience to effectively deliver them the knowledge or skills that accomplish an outcome.  Creating a moment of interactivity with no purpose is a waste of the audience’s time… and a waste of yours.  Don’t use a poll just to “be interactive.”

Don’t use interactivity tools without a reason.

Q&A: Should you mention a person’s name during Q&A?

During a recent webinar, Tony W. asked

Is it a helpful technique to mention the person’s name who asks the question like you guys are doing right now?  Don’t some people get offended by this?

Tony,

I think you should consider it both in terms of context and culture.  Here are a few things to consider:

Generally, I do mention names – first names only.  The sweetest sound to anyone’s ear is their own name, and not only do you get that person’s attention when you respond with their name, but you get other people’s attention as well.  It’s part of what makes a live event real and personal.  I think it’s a big mistake to make a live event as impersonal as an on-demand piece of content.  That said, ask yourself a few questions:

What is the culture of the audience?

This could be national or geographic.  This could be organizational.  There are no absolutes, and you want to be sensitive to cultural norms.

What is the nature of the session?

Is it a smaller, private training session with 15 participants?  Is it like a public seminar where the speaker asks everyone to write their name on a card and set it up in front of them so s/he can respond by name?  Have you promised anonymity or would you and your audience benefit by keeping responses anonymous?

Is the event public or private?

I’m a big respecter of privacy, so I don’t use last names in public events, but unless everyone in the audience knows “Tony,” you’re not breaching that trust to address a question with “Tony asks a fair question… let me address that.”  If it’s a private event, what are the expectations?  As I mentioned earlier, I don’t use last names (or any other identifying info such as company), but I think you can personalize and respect privacy at the same time in a public setting.

If it’s important based on the context and culture, I’d be sure to address it when you set the ground rules for your meeting.  Err on the side of caution, but don’t through out an amazing opportunity to be live, personal, and real.  It’s what distinguishes the shared experience of a live event from all the other on-demand noise.

How not to use Twitter as a presentation backchannel

What if your presentation was hooked to twitter, and every time you changed slides, all the words on your slide were sent as a tweet?  How cool is that?

Not very, if you ask me.

Don’t get me wrong, when I bumped into this free tool to use with Keynote (shared by Tuaw) that would tweet out your presentation text.

Here are four reasons I wouldn’t recommend it:

You should present more like Steve Jobs.  And Steve’s presentations would make lousy tweets

Steve’s the master of simple, powerful imagery and few words.  How relevant would it be to tweet out one word that had no image?  Strike 1.

Most presentations deserve the moniker “death by bullet.”  Too many words = lousy tweets

Unless you planned the presentation to keep everything under 140 characters, the tweet gets cut off, and the thought is thwarted.  Strike 2.

Presenting is an audio/visual communication format.  Twitter is not

If your presentation can be read and doesn’t need you presenting, you’re wasting your audience’s (and your) time anyway.  Do them a favor – write them a paper and avoid  Strike 3.

The power of Twitter is voice with value

When someone watches your presentation and tweets something out, it’s something they find of value enough to share with their followers who they believe will find it of value.  AND they usually share a complete thought that makes sense unto itself.  Used right, that’ll attract eyeballs.  Use it poorly and you’ll hear a big sucking sound near the unfollow button.

Virtual meeting IQ: Q&A

The great news is that Effective Virtual Meetings:  Seven Ways to Boost Your Virtual Meeting IQ is that it was interactive and there were a ton of questions.  The bad news is that when there are 500 people in the audience, you can’t get to them all.Q&A

Following is one that came in that I didn’t get to during the presentation:

Chris C. asks, “How do you manage running the meeting with monitoring chats?”

Practice, for starters.  (I’ve been doing this a long time).

Have you ever hopped in an unfamiliar car and tried to turn on the headlights only to have the windshield wipers start flapping?

Repetition breeds familiarity, and in time you know where to look, know where to grab, etc.  Start with one tool and get good at it.  Then in a meeting or three find another that suits your style and start using it.

I’d start with chat, because it directly facilitates dialogue.  And like I mentioned in the webinar, I’d keep it open and glance back and forth between it and your presentation, just like you watch your audience AND glance at your notes when presenting in person.

Virtual meeting IQ: Q&A

The great news is that Effective Virtual Meetings:  Seven Ways to Boost Your Virtual Meeting IQ is that it was interactive and there were a ton of questions.  The bad news is that when there are 500 people in the audience, you can’t get to them all.Q&A

Following is one that came in that I didn’t get to during the presentation:

Scot R. asked a few questions:

“How would you work OneNote into this?

When I dropped out of PowerPoint to demonstrate how to use Word as an ‘active agenda,’ I was just sharing my desktop.  Anything you’ve got on your computer desktop can be shown to your audience, so OneNote would work just fine!  (BTW, it’s a great program…love OneNote!).

“Would you recommend using the video in the meeting?”

That’s a longer answer than I’m going to take the space for here.  For a multi-page dissertation about how it works and why I’m very careful with the use of video in a meeting, get the book (please don’t take that as a pitch – I’m just pointing you toward the one resource I know about that addresses this in depth).

The question I’d ask is “what’s the tradeoff?”  Video can be useful, and sometimes it’s even necessary, but there’s a cost technologically.  What’s the value you’ll get versus the potential downside?  Example:  if yours is a marketing presentation and you’re unsure of your audiences’ technical savvy, bandwidth, computer horsepower, etc., is what you’ll gain worth the potential risk? (Also see what I wrote to Mary Ellen and Catherine)

It’s a tool – and all tools have their place.

“I work with lots of developers, if I have them at their desk how do I keep them engaged (instead of working on the code so they can leave)?”

We’re talking about remote audiences here.  If they all piled into a conference room you not only cannot engage them one-on-one, ask them to contribute, ask them to answer a question, etc., you still can’t guarantee their not coding either.

In addition to including each individual in the discussion, keep things moving.  Even someone who glances away or goes to check email will come back so as to not miss something.  It’s part of why I push 70-80 slides in a presentation (~30 seconds each).

Finally, remember the ‘move the needle’ exhortation.  You’ll never get 100% participation in any meeting, save CEO mandate.  Think through what you’d do in ANY meeting to improve its “interestingness” (to coin a word), and remember the goal is to improve the averages.

Page 1 of 3123»